A lighter way to drive?

I caught this news item this morning on the Marketplace Morning Report: Non-hybrid Axon takes on Prius. The body of the Axon car is carbon fibre, just like what’s used in Formula One racing cars. The resulting savings in weight gives the car a fuel economy rating of 80 miles per gallon, and that’s with a normal internal combustion gasoline engine. The best part: It’s expected to cost about as much as the average family car, according to Axon.

I couldn’t find information on whether it’s in production, or how far off production is, or whether it’s coming to the states eventually. There’s a link to Axon Automotive in the article, but it’s saying their bandwidth has been all used up for today.

I say “Wow.” Of course, there are comments on Marketplace’s website from naysayers. The basic point of most negative comments was, let’s not develop a better conventional gasoline-powered car, let’s develop an alternative fuel source. Which is all well and good, except we’ll be waiting for years to get an alternative fuel source and delivery system in place. In the meantime, here is a solution ready now, or close to ready, perhaps. It uses existing infrastructure, only more cheaply. And we have a need for any improvements that are possible now, while we’re waiting for the Big Shiny Thing to appear. Personally, I’d like to make some progress now if we could.

Advertisements

About songdogmi

I'm a longhaired almost-hippie stuck in the inner suburbs of a major rust-belt metropolis who's thoughtful, creative, and kind of geeky. In exchange for a paycheck I run around in a cubicle maze most days. When I escape, I play music, hang out in coffee houses, dink around on the computer, take naps, and think I should be off in the woods somewhere. Every once in a while I get in my car and drive far, far away, though I've always come back so far.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A lighter way to drive?

  1. altivo says:

    It probably won’t meet US safety standards, and, one suspects, because revising those standards to allow it would hurt the market share of US-based corporations, it won’t be permitted by the current administration at least.

    • songdogmi says:

      You’re probably right, unfortunately. And gods know, none of the U.S. Big Three could license the technology or somehow become part of a solution instead of a roadblock… (although to be somewhat fair, they don’t exactly have lots of free research and development funds these days, what with all their billion-dollar losses).

      • altivo says:

        Not to mention the fact that it would reduce oil consumption, reducing the profits of the oil companies. That isn’t going to go over well with this administration either, nor with a McCain government.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s